All the instructions are below

For this assignment you will answer all the questions in the file below, and follow all the instructions. * Please becarful of pilgrims * use simple and clear language * all the assignment are APA style ( DO NOT forget the in-text citation) * this assignment counts big grade so please make sure to follow all the instructions ( I will attach the rubric
crj_instuctions_assignment.docx

crj_rubric.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
All the instructions are below
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CRJ 330
Law and the Courts
Spring 2018
Critical Analysis Activity 4
Section 1: Multiple Choice (2 points per question)
1. The penalty phase of the criminal justice system is:
a. arrest
b. trial
c. sentencing
d. arraignment
2. Sentencing ALWAYS involves:
a. incarceration
b. fines
c. fines and incarceration
d. none of the above
3. A primary goal of corrections is:
a. offender reintegration
b. offender punishment
c. just-deserts for offenders
d. all of the above
4. Sentencing where parole boards determine an inmate’s early release is called:
a. determinate
b. presumptive
c. mandatory
d. indeterminate
5. Sentences of unspecified durations are:
a. determinate
b. presumptive
c. mandatory
d. indeterminate
6. A primary objective of determinate sentencing is to provide prisoners with:
a. greater release certainty
b. better options
c. greater punishment
d. diminished punishment
7. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have been determined by the U.S. Supreme Court to be:
a. unconstitutional
b. constitutional
c. cruel and unusual
d. excessive
8. Under the U.S. Sentencing guidelines, sentences may be increased by:
a. aggravating circumstances
b. mitigating circumstances
c. an offender’s race
d. an offender’s gender
9. An aggravating circumstance may be:
a. being mentally ill
b. being disabled
c. causing bodily harm
d. enticing violence
10. A mitigating circumstance may be:
a. having a previous criminal record
b. having no previous criminal record
c. causing serious bodily harm
d. enticing violence
11. When a judge sentences two offenders to different prison terms and where the offenders have similar criminal histories and
have committed the same offenses, this may be evidence of:
a. sentencing disparity
b. judicial leniency
c. sentencing severity
d. just deserts
12. The sentencing scheme most likely to use good-time credits for determining an inmate’s early release would be:
a. mandatory sentencing
b. presumptive sentencing
c. determinate sentencing
d. guidelines-based sentencing
13. The Crime Bill of 1994 is most closely associated with:
a. truth-in-sentencing laws
b. indeterminate sentencing
c. presumptive sentencing
d. guidelines-based sentencing
14. _____________________ involves assisting criminals in becoming readjusted so that they fit back into their communities and
society.
a. Restoration
b. Reintegration
c. Rehabilitation
d. Reverser
15. The main intent of habitual offender statutes are to:
a. punish offenders
b. rehabilitate offenders
c. restore offenders
d. incapacitate offenders
16. The minimum number of jury members in any criminal trial in any state court is:
a. 12
b. 6
c. 9
d. 15
17. If guilty verdicts are rendered by juries, defendants:
a. may appeal
b. may not appeal
c. have no further recourse
d. must seek redress in a lower court
18. Asking prospective jurors questions regarding background, propensity for bias, etc. is a process known as:
a. habeas corpus
b. amicus curiae
c. voir dire
d. certiorari
19. Jury sequestration is done to prevent jurors from being influenced by:
a. trial testimony
b. media coverage of trials
c. spouses of jurors
d. judicial instructions
20. Hung juries usually result in:
a. guilty verdicts
b. acquittals
c. no verdicts
d. none of the above
21. If plea bargaining is rejected by a defendant and the defendant goes to court and loses the case through a jury trial, the
sentence received from the judge compared with what would have been received through the plea bargain is usually:
a. more severe
b. less severe
c. about the same
d. none of the above
22. If a defendant refuses a plea bargain and, as a result, the prosecutor threatens the defendant with a more serious criminal
charge (for which the prosecutor has evidence), this is:
a. unconstitutional
b. constitutional
c. unethical
d. unfair
23. One thing a judge must ask a defendant during plea agreement hearings is whether the defendant:
a. wishes a reduced sentence
b. wishes to serve time in jail or prison
c. entered the plea voluntarily
d. entered the plea without witness
24. Trials conducted by a judge where the judge decides the guilt or innocence of the accused are called:
a. bench trials
b. jury trials
c. autocratic trials
d. supreme trials
25. Participation by judges in the plea bargaining process between defense counsel and the prosecutor in most jurisdictions is:
a. condoned
b. constitutional
c. prohibited
d. condoned, only if the judge insists on being included
Section 2: Short Answer
26. Should plea-bargaining be banned? Why or why not? Be specific. If not, what alternatives might be implemented? There is no
“right answer” to this question. Please be clear with your position and make sure to fully reason the “whys.” (at least 2
paragraphs) (10 points)
27. http://www.npr.org/2011/10/31/141730624/high-court-considers-when-bad-lawyers-taint-a-case.
Galin Frye was charged with multiple counts of driving with a revoked license. During discovery, prosecutors offered to reduce
the severity of Galin’s charges if he pled guilty and served a 90-day jail sentence. This offer was never communicated to Galin
and, as a result, he pled guilty in open court and was sentenced to three years in prison. He argued on appeal (before the U.S.
Supreme Court) that part of any defense is the conduct of plea negotiations and his lawyer’s failure to tell him of the
prosecutor’s plea offer denied him the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. As it turns out, The
Court agreed! You can read (and hear) the Court’s opinion here: http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_444.
Please discuss whether the Court decided this case correctly. Why or why not? Be specific. (at least 2 paragraphs) (20 points)
28. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/how-we-misunderstand-mass-incarceration
This article ran in a recent issue of The New Yorker. The article’s author, Adam Gopnik, is a longtime American writer and
essayist who has been openly critical of the criminal justice system in the United States since the mid-1990s. In this piece, he
discusses misconceptions with the ‘system’ and how these misconceptions lead to initiatives for reform that are not successful
(and costly). He also discusses prosecutorial misconduct/over-reach and its impact on incarceration numbers.
Please summarize one ‘misunderstanding’ identified by Adam. Discuss Adam’s position on this ‘misunderstanding’ and how he
identifies it as a contributing factor to the overall issues in the criminal justice system. Likewise, take a position on the
‘misunderstanding’ using your own credible outside research. (at least 3 paragraphs) (20 points)
Terms
Please comply with APA formatting/citation guidelines. No ‘abstracts’ are required. Please do not write in the first-person narrative (I,
we, our…) You may use sub-sections.
Learning Activity Rubric rev9-2017
Learning Activity Rubric rev9-2017
Criteria
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeCritical
Thinking/Analysis
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeStylistics
Ratings
50.0 pts
Above Average. Rich
in content. Extensive
thought, insight, and
analysis.
25.0 pts
Above Average. No
obvious grammatical
or stylistic errors.
37.5 pts
Average. Substantial.
Thought, insight, and
analysis have taken
place.
15.0 pts
18.75 pts
Below Average. Obvious
Average. Very few
grammatical or stylistic
grammatical or
errors. Errors interfere with
stylistic errors.
content.
This criterion is linked to a
25.0 pts
18.75 pts
Learning
Above Average. Proper Average. Proper
OutcomeCitation/Formatting format and citations with format and citations
no obvious errors.
0.0 pts
30.0 pts
Unacceptable. Rudimenta
Below Average. Generally
and superficial. Limited
competent. Information is
analysis or insight is
thin or commonplace.
evident.
0.0 pts
Unacceptable. Obvious
grammatical or stylistic errors.
Errors make understanding and
continuity difficult.
15.0 pts
Below Average. Proper
format and citations with
with very few errors. errors that are distracting.
0.0 pts
Unacceptable. Little or no
attempt at proper format
and/or citations.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

GradeAcers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code DISCOUNT15