All the instructions are below

For this assignment you will answer all the questions in the file below, and follow all the instructions. * Please becarful of pilgrims * use simple and clear language * all the assignment are APA style ( DO NOT forget the in-text citation) * this assignment counts big grade so please make sure to follow all the instructions ( I will attach the rubric
crj_instuctions_assignment.docx

crj_rubric.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
All the instructions are below
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CRJ 330
Law and the Courts
Spring 2018
Critical Analysis Activity 4
Section 1: Multiple Choice (2 points per question)
1. The penalty phase of the criminal justice system is:
a. arrest
b. trial
c. sentencing
d. arraignment
2. Sentencing ALWAYS involves:
a. incarceration
b. fines
c. fines and incarceration
d. none of the above
3. A primary goal of corrections is:
a. offender reintegration
b. offender punishment
c. just-deserts for offenders
d. all of the above
4. Sentencing where parole boards determine an inmate’s early release is called:
a. determinate
b. presumptive
c. mandatory
d. indeterminate
5. Sentences of unspecified durations are:
a. determinate
b. presumptive
c. mandatory
d. indeterminate
6. A primary objective of determinate sentencing is to provide prisoners with:
a. greater release certainty
b. better options
c. greater punishment
d. diminished punishment
7. The U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have been determined by the U.S. Supreme Court to be:
a. unconstitutional
b. constitutional
c. cruel and unusual
d. excessive
8. Under the U.S. Sentencing guidelines, sentences may be increased by:
a. aggravating circumstances
b. mitigating circumstances
c. an offender’s race
d. an offender’s gender
9. An aggravating circumstance may be:
a. being mentally ill
b. being disabled
c. causing bodily harm
d. enticing violence
10. A mitigating circumstance may be:
a. having a previous criminal record
b. having no previous criminal record
c. causing serious bodily harm
d. enticing violence
11. When a judge sentences two offenders to different prison terms and where the offenders have similar criminal histories and
have committed the same offenses, this may be evidence of:
a. sentencing disparity
b. judicial leniency
c. sentencing severity
d. just deserts
12. The sentencing scheme most likely to use good-time credits for determining an inmate’s early release would be:
a. mandatory sentencing
b. presumptive sentencing
c. determinate sentencing
d. guidelines-based sentencing
13. The Crime Bill of 1994 is most closely associated with:
a. truth-in-sentencing laws
b. indeterminate sentencing
c. presumptive sentencing
d. guidelines-based sentencing
14. _____________________ involves assisting criminals in becoming readjusted so that they fit back into their communities and
society.
a. Restoration
b. Reintegration
c. Rehabilitation
d. Reverser
15. The main intent of habitual offender statutes are to:
a. punish offenders
b. rehabilitate offenders
c. restore offenders
d. incapacitate offenders
16. The minimum number of jury members in any criminal trial in any state court is:
a. 12
b. 6
c. 9
d. 15
17. If guilty verdicts are rendered by juries, defendants:
a. may appeal
b. may not appeal
c. have no further recourse
d. must seek redress in a lower court
18. Asking prospective jurors questions regarding background, propensity for bias, etc. is a process known as:
a. habeas corpus
b. amicus curiae
c. voir dire
d. certiorari
19. Jury sequestration is done to prevent jurors from being influenced by:
a. trial testimony
b. media coverage of trials
c. spouses of jurors
d. judicial instructions
20. Hung juries usually result in:
a. guilty verdicts
b. acquittals
c. no verdicts
d. none of the above
21. If plea bargaining is rejected by a defendant and the defendant goes to court and loses the case through a jury trial, the
sentence received from the judge compared with what would have been received through the plea bargain is usually:
a. more severe
b. less severe
c. about the same
d. none of the above
22. If a defendant refuses a plea bargain and, as a result, the prosecutor threatens the defendant with a more serious criminal
charge (for which the prosecutor has evidence), this is:
a. unconstitutional
b. constitutional
c. unethical
d. unfair
23. One thing a judge must ask a defendant during plea agreement hearings is whether the defendant:
a. wishes a reduced sentence
b. wishes to serve time in jail or prison
c. entered the plea voluntarily
d. entered the plea without witness
24. Trials conducted by a judge where the judge decides the guilt or innocence of the accused are called:
a. bench trials
b. jury trials
c. autocratic trials
d. supreme trials
25. Participation by judges in the plea bargaining process between defense counsel and the prosecutor in most jurisdictions is:
a. condoned
b. constitutional
c. prohibited
d. condoned, only if the judge insists on being included
Section 2: Short Answer
26. Should plea-bargaining be banned? Why or why not? Be specific. If not, what alternatives might be implemented? There is no
“right answer” to this question. Please be clear with your position and make sure to fully reason the “whys.” (at least 2
paragraphs) (10 points)
27. http://www.npr.org/2011/10/31/141730624/high-court-considers-when-bad-lawyers-taint-a-case.
Galin Frye was charged with multiple counts of driving with a revoked license. During discovery, prosecutors offered to reduce
the severity of Galin’s charges if he pled guilty and served a 90-day jail sentence. This offer was never communicated to Galin
and, as a result, he pled guilty in open court and was sentenced to three years in prison. He argued on appeal (before the U.S.
Supreme Court) that part of any defense is the conduct of plea negotiations and his lawyer’s failure to tell him of the
prosecutor’s plea offer denied him the effective assistance of counsel guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. As it turns out, The
Court agreed! You can read (and hear) the Court’s opinion here: http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2011/2011_10_444.
Please discuss whether the Court decided this case correctly. Why or why not? Be specific. (at least 2 paragraphs) (20 points)
28. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/10/how-we-misunderstand-mass-incarceration
This article ran in a recent issue of The New Yorker. The article’s author, Adam Gopnik, is a longtime American writer and
essayist who has been openly critical of the criminal justice system in the United States since the mid-1990s. In this piece, he
discusses misconceptions with the ‘system’ and how these misconceptions lead to initiatives for reform that are not successful
(and costly). He also discusses prosecutorial misconduct/over-reach and its impact on incarceration numbers.
Please summarize one ‘misunderstanding’ identified by Adam. Discuss Adam’s position on this ‘misunderstanding’ and how he
identifies it as a contributing factor to the overall issues in the criminal justice system. Likewise, take a position on the
‘misunderstanding’ using your own credible outside research. (at least 3 paragraphs) (20 points)
Terms
Please comply with APA formatting/citation guidelines. No ‘abstracts’ are required. Please do not write in the first-person narrative (I,
we, our…) You may use sub-sections.
Learning Activity Rubric rev9-2017
Learning Activity Rubric rev9-2017
Criteria
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeCritical
Thinking/Analysis
This criterion is linked to a
Learning OutcomeStylistics
Ratings
50.0 pts
Above Average. Rich
in content. Extensive
thought, insight, and
analysis.
25.0 pts
Above Average. No
obvious grammatical
or stylistic errors.
37.5 pts
Average. Substantial.
Thought, insight, and
analysis have taken
place.
15.0 pts
18.75 pts
Below Average. Obvious
Average. Very few
grammatical or stylistic
grammatical or
errors. Errors interfere with
stylistic errors.
content.
This criterion is linked to a
25.0 pts
18.75 pts
Learning
Above Average. Proper Average. Proper
OutcomeCitation/Formatting format and citations with format and citations
no obvious errors.
0.0 pts
30.0 pts
Unacceptable. Rudimenta
Below Average. Generally
and superficial. Limited
competent. Information is
analysis or insight is
thin or commonplace.
evident.
0.0 pts
Unacceptable. Obvious
grammatical or stylistic errors.
Errors make understanding and
continuity difficult.
15.0 pts
Below Average. Proper
format and citations with
with very few errors. errors that are distracting.
0.0 pts
Unacceptable. Little or no
attempt at proper format
and/or citations.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code DISCOUNT15