answer to the question given in assignment by someone given below?

Onion-peeling theories focus on the person served resolving past issues preventing forward motion in the present. These theories contain multiple subsets, which include person-centred approaches. Person-centred approaches have their historic roots in Carl Rogers work on inter-subjectivity.Person-centred approaches believe in maximizing the self-determination of the person served. Self-determination is maximized through the social worker and person served working together to create a “non-directive, safe, and empathic relationship” (Ives, Denov, & Sussman, 2015, p.45). One important distinguishing element that separates person-centred approaches from psychodynamic theories is the more active role played by the person served in developing a mutual relationship. The person-centred approach eschews the more paternal and directive relational constructs used by psychodynamic theories. To be successful – like most approaches — the person served must feel heard and valued.Two of the strengths of person-centred approaches are high satisfaction in persons served due to the deep listening and interpretation involved in the creation of the therapeutic relationship and the high amount of healing outcomes experienced by persons served. However, person-centred approaches are oftentimes intensive and have been considered “reductionist and deterministic” (p.46) for their focus on the past as the cause of present difficulties.The majority of The Code of Ethics is easily integrated with the principles of person-centred approaches. Value 1: Respect for the Inherent Dignity and Worth of a Person and Value 3: Service to Humanity are particularly well aligned. However, Value 4: Integrity of Professional Practice is not as well aligned. Professional boundaries can be challenged by the relational aspect of person-centred approaches. The Code of Ethics requires “appropriate professional boundaries” (Ives et al., 2015, p.69) be maintained. The exact definition of “appropriate” is left for an individual to determine; appropriate could be defined more rigidly by some social workers than others.The co-creation of a relationship, as demanded by person-centred approaches, allows for situations where a more reciprocal relationship is desired, but the very concept of a reciprocal relationship is “subversive of social work practice norms” (Alexander & Charles, 2009, p.5).The desire for reciprocity may place the social worker in a situation where they must rebuff the attempts of a person served to create a reciprocal relationship, perhaps through the giving of gifts. The relationship then becomes a balancing act as a deep and professional therapeutic relationship is still required for person-centred approaches. Charles and Alexander argue the Code of Ethics is creating situations where “professional guidelines can restrict the potential for connection and paradoxically, this may limit the effectiveness of [the social worker’s] contribution to the client’s desired change” (2009, p.6).By maintaining the boundaries mandated in the Code of Ethics, person-centred approaches may be weakened as persons served feel as if the enforced distance makes the social worker less trustworthy or authentic.How are creating an authentic connection and maintaining professional boundaries to be balanced in practice? How does this effect self-disclosure?Citations:Alexander, C., & Charles, G. (2009). Caring, Mutuality and Reciprocity in Social Worker-Client Relationships: Rethinking Principles of Practice. Journal of Social Work, 9(1), 5-22. doi: 10.1177/1468017308098420Ives, N., Denov, M., Sussman, T. (2015). Introduction to social work in Canada:Histories, contexts, and practices. Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
answer to the question given in assignment by someone given below?
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code DISCOUNT15