Class influence on addiction definition

Assignment 4: Point Value 30 For this assignment, please revisit your response to the following item in Assignment 2, “What do drug abuse and/or addiction mean to you and how would you define them?”.How has this class strengthened/weakened/left unchanged what drug use/addiction means to you? Please discuss, providing at least one thing you learned this semester that impacted your previously held opinions.Identitfy one strength and one weakness of your first definition of addiction (if your first submission lacked notable strengths, list two weaknesses). Explain why you feel these were accurate or inaccurate to use in defining addiction.Refine your definition of addcition to include material we have covered in class, citing at least two principles from the textbook (APA style).Formatting:Length: at least 1pg, no more than 2 pgs (not including references page)Font: Times New Roman 12ptMargins: 1” all aroundSpacing: Single SpacedReferences: APA styleNOTE: the paper is not to be completed in APA style, rather your in-paper references and works cited page are to follow APA guidelines. This means there should be NO: header, page number, cover page, tite, abstract, etc.( I attched my frined work for this assigmnet it might give you some idea )
optional_assignment__1_.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Class influence on addiction definition
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Article published by the Boston Globe
By Maria Cramer, September 24, 2017
The first time Julie Eldred violated her probation by using drugs, the judge gave her a break,
sending her to a treatment program instead of the women’s prison in Framingham.
But soon after her release, the need to use overwhelmed her, and she relapsed again. Her next
court-ordered drug test came up positive — for opiates.
She wrote the judge to apologize, and thanked him for the compassion he had shown her before.
But when she stood before him in Concord District Court, he crumpled up the letter and threw it
aside.
“This is just a bunch of excuses,” he told her.
As she stood there, stunned and humiliated, the court officers handcuffed her. Placed on probation
for stealing, she was being sent to jail for using drugs. A similar series of events would unfold
again three years later, in 2016, with Eldred again unable to remain drug free on probation.
Eldred now alleges that the court violated her constitutional rights by ordering her to remain drug
free, arguing that her substance use disorder makes it virtually impossible for her to control her
drug use through sheer will.
Early next month, her case will come before the state’s highest court, an unusual challenge that
could force major changes in how the probation department treats addiction in criminal defendants
amid an opioid crisis that has claimed thousands of lives and shows little sign of abating.
“Drug addiction, we now know, is a chronic brain disease whose hallmark feature is an inability
to exert control over the impulse to use drugs despite negative consequences,” Eldred’s lawyers,
Lisa Newman-Polk and Benjamin H. Keehn, wrote in a 39-page brief. “Punishing relapse is
‘clinically contradicted.’ As this case makes clear, it is also morally indefensible.”
The case carries enormous implications for the courts, which regularly order defendants to remain
drug free as a condition of their probation. That requirement, prosecutors say, is critical to
protecting the welfare of defendants and the public.
Lawyers in Attorney General Maura Healey’s office said the judge may have saved Eldred’s life
by sending her to jail, sparing her from a potential overdose.
In a brief to the Supreme Judicial Court, they asserted that the comparison of substance use
disorder to such chronic diseases as hypertension, cancer, or asthma is inaccurate because those
illnesses are almost always controlled by treatment, not an act of will.
“The drug free and testing conditions of probation are constitutional because they are based on the
proven assumption that most people with drug addiction retain the ability to exercise choice,”
Assistant Attorney General Maria Granik wrote.
That argument appears to be at odds with a statement Healey made in 2016 to the Washington
Times about addiction, a discrepancy Eldred’s lawyers highlighted in one of their briefs to the
SJC.
“Addictions are a chronically relapsing medical condition, not a lack of willpower,” Healey said,
according to the article. “Our efforts must open the doors to treatment, rather than incarceration.”
‘I wish they could spend one night in [MCI] Framingham, all the people who think it’s a good
idea to send us there.’
Julie Eldred, who was sent to jail for using drugs while on probation
Healey declined to comment directly on the case. Her spokeswoman, Emily Snyder, wrote in an
e-mail that “for some, the court system can be an important part of their recovery journey.”
“Research shows that drug-free testing can help probationers reach recovery goals, and testing can
help defendants remain engaged in treatment and avoid long-term incarceration,” she wrote.
Probation is a period of supervised release often imposed on criminal defendants in lieu of jail
time. The probation department does not keep track of how many defendants are asked to remain
drug free as part of their supervised release, but lawyers say judges regularly require it as a
condition for defendants whose crimes involved drug use.
The high court, which two years ago relied heavily on science in its ruling that juveniles are less
culpable of crimes than adults because they are developmentally immature, may again turn to
medical research to decide Eldred’s case.
Doctors for both sides have weighed in on the case, filing briefs that reveal a sharp divide between
medical specialists who maintain addiction should be viewed like other medical disorders and
psychiatrists who say that position remains highly contested.
Where the court lands will have broad repercussions, specialists say.
“We’re in this moment in time where everyone is using language about how this is a public health
crisis,” said Sarah Wakeman, medical director of the Substance Use Disorders Initiative at
Massachusetts General Hospital who filed an affidavit supporting Eldred’s claim. “And yet in our
criminal justice system, we continue to see cases like this where people are in prison for a symptom
of their illness. We need to change that approach and this case has the potential to be a step toward
that.”
Most doctors and medical organizations, including the Massachusetts Medical Society and the
American Medical Association, say the science is established — addiction is a chronic illness that,
like diabetes and heart disease, is caused by a combination of behavioral, environmental, and
biological factors and cannot be willed into remission.
But three psychologists and one psychiatrist who filed a 57-page brief supporting the probation
practice said that if the SJC agrees courts should not impose staying drug free as a condition, that
could make it impossible to hold people accountable for drug use.
“The threat of being incarcerated, or re-incarcerated or sanctioned in some way, gives the addict
an extremely powerful incentive to stay clean,” they wrote.
One of those doctors, Sally Satel, a Washington D.C.-based psychiatrist who works part time at a
methadone clinic, said people with addictions can and do respond to consequences and reason.
“Everyone who comes into my methadone clinic came in because someone said, ‘I’m going to fire
you or I’m going to leave you,’ ” said Satel, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute,
a conservative think tank in Washington D.C. “They’re all pressured. They just finally feel that
they are so demoralized, so beaten down by the life that they’re leading that they decide to come
in. And that’s a decision.”
Four years after the judge crumpled up her letter, Eldred cries at the memory.
“Just the feeling that no one cared, no one understands me, and I was going . . . to jail,” she said,
shaking from her sobs.
Eldred said she never believed that her drug addiction was a matter of choice. She believes she
was genetically predisposed to addiction through her biological parents, whom she has never met.
She began taking prescription drugs in high school. She was popular, a cheerleader whose adoptive
parents showered her with affection. But she was painfully shy.
It was only when she and her friends began getting high that she finally felt comfortable in her
own skin.
“It made me feel like I could fit in wherever I wanted,” she said. But unlike her friends, Eldred
began using drugs almost every day, becoming so addicted that she would suffer sleepless nights,
sweating and shivering, if she were sober for long.
In her 20s, Eldred began using heroin after she went into a detox program where she met people
using the drug. By the time she was 25, she was stealing to get opiates.
After violating her probation in 2013, she spent two months in MCI-Framingham, then enrolled in
a treatment program. For three years, she maintained sobriety. She enrolled at North Shore
Community College and began taking classes in animal behavior. She started dating a nice man.
But in time, she stopped going to Narcotics Anonymous meetings and drifted away from the
recovery program that had helped her get off drugs. Two years ago, at 27, she started using again.
She was arrested for stealing jewelry to buy drugs and again was sentenced to probation. Repeating
the cycle, she tested positive for fentanyl. She served 10 days behind bars while her lawyer
searched for an opening in a treatment program.
Now 29, she completed probation last month, is sober and hopes to start a career in animal care.
She credits her recovery to several factors — a rescue dog she adopted, counseling, and a doctor
who prescribed her suboxone, a drug that helps suppress the urge for heroin.
Eldred said jail, where drugs were often available and she once witnessed an overdose, only
undercut her recovery.
“I wish they could spend one night in Framingham, all the people who think it’s a good idea to
send us there,” Eldred said. “It’s so degrading. It’s so dehumanizing. If [judges] could experience
it, they would not send people there at all.”

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

GradeAcers
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission Essays & Business Writing Help

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Reviews

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.

Order your essay today and save 15% with the discount code DISCOUNT15