# Create a 5-7 Page Mathematical Proof in APA Format

Hi there, I need a native U.S. English speaker and writer (no foreigners, please) who is fluent in writing mathematical proofs to complete the attached assignment by April 19 – 8:00 am EST in MS Word format.Very Important: Please do NOT bid if you don’t understand the assignment or cannot complete it on time.
assignment_instructions.docx

conway_s_zip_proof_by_francis___weeks.pdf

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Create a 5-7 Page Mathematical Proof in APA Format
Just from \$13/Page

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Assignment Instructions
Prove the Classification of Surfaces Theorem using the Conway ZIP proof (in the attached
PDF document). The proof should be around 5-7 pages, APA 6th edition format.
Due: April 19, 2018  8:00 am EST
Classification of Surfaces Theorem
There are 3 versions of the theorem but all 3 theorems are equivalent:
Theorem 1: Any closed surface is homeomorphic either to:
1.1 The Sphere
1.2 The sphere with a finite number of handles added
1.3 The sphere with a finite number of discs removed and replaced by Mobius strips.
Theorem 2: Any closed surface is homeomorphic either to:
2.1 The sphere
2.2 A connected sum of tori
2.3 A connected sum of projective planes
Theorem 3: Any closed surface is homeomorphic either to:
3.1 The sphere
3.2 A connected sum of tori
3.3 A connected sum of a tori and one projective plane
3.4 A connected sum of a tori and two projective planes
Conways ZIP Proof
George K. Francis
Jeffrey R. Weeks
December 28, 2000
Surfaces arise naturally in many different forms, in branches of mathematics
ranging from complex analysis to dynamical systems. The Classification Theorem, known since the 1860s, asserts that all closed surfaces, despite their diverse
origins and seemingly diverse forms, are topologically equivalent to spheres with
some number of handles or crosscaps (to be defined below). The proofs found
in most modern textbooks follow that of Seifert and Threlfall [5]. Seifert and
Threlfalls proof, while satisfyingly constructive, requires that a given surface
be brought into a somewhat artificial standard form. Here we present a completely new proof, discovered by John H. Conway in about 1992, which retains
the constructive nature of [5] while eliminating the irrelevancies of the standard
form. Conway calls it his Zero Irrelevancy Proof, or ZIP proof, and asks that
it always be called by this name, remarking that otherwise theres a real danger
that its origin would be lost, since everyone who hears it immediately regards
it as the obvious proof. We trust that Conways ingenious proof will replace
the customary textbook repetition of Seifert-Threlfall in favor of a lighter, fatfree nouvelle cuisine approach that retains all the classical flavor of elementary
topology.
We work in the realm of topology, where surfaces may be freely stretched and
deformed. For example, a sphere and an ellipsoid are topologically equivalent,
because one may be smoothly deformed into the other. But a sphere and a
doughnut surface are topologically different, because no such deformation is
possible. All the figures in the present article depict deformations of surfaces.
For example, the square with two holes in Figure 1A is topologically equivalent
to the square with two tubes (1B), because one may be deformed to the other.
More generally, two surfaces are considered equivalent, or homeomorphic, if and
only if one may be mapped onto the other in a continuous, one-to-one fashion.
That is, its the final equivalence that counts, whether or not it was obtained
via a deformation.
1
Figure 2. Crosshandle
Figure 1. Handle
Let us introduce the primitive topological features in terms of zippers or
zip-pairs, a zip being half a zipper. Figure 1A shows a surface with two boundary circles, each with a zip. Zip the zips, and the surface acquires a handle (1D).
If we reverse the direction of one of the zips (2A), then one of the tubes must
pass through itself (2B) to get the zip orientations to match. Figure 2B shows
the self-intersecting tube with a vertical slice temporarily removed, so the reader
may see its structure more easily. Zipping the zips (2C) yields a crosshandle
(2D). This picture of a crosshandle contains a line of self-intersection. The selfintersection is an interesting feature of the surfaces placement in 3-dimensional
space, but has no effect on the intrinsic topology of the surface itself.
Figure 3. Cap
Figure 4. Crosscap
If the zips occupy two halves of a single boundary circle (Figure 3A), and
their orientations are consistent, then we get a cap (3C), which is topologically
trivial (3D) and wont be considered further. If the zip orientations are inconsistent (4A), the result is more interesting. We deform the surface so that
2
corresponding points on the two zips lie opposite one another (4B), and begin
zipping. At first the zipper head moves uneventfully upward (4C), but upon
reaching the top it starts downward, zipping together the other two sheets
and creating a line of self-intersection. As before, the self-intersection is merely
an artifact of the model, and has no effect on the intrinsic topology of the surface. The result is a crosscap (4D), shown here with a cut-away view to make
the self-intersections clearer.
The preceding constructions should make the concept of a surface clear to
non-specialists. Specialists may note that our surfaces are compact, and may
have boundary.
Comment. A surface is not assumed to be connected.
Comment. Figure 5 shows an example of a triangulated surface. All surfaces
may be triangulated, but the proof [4] is difficult. Instead we may consider the
Classification Theorem to be a statement about surfaces that have already been
triangulated.
Definition. A perforation is whats left when you remove an open disk from a
surface. For example, Figure 1A shows a portion of a surface with two perforations.
Definition. A surface is ordinary if it is homeomorphic to a finite collection
of spheres, each with a finite number of handles, crosshandles, crosscaps, and
perforations.
Classification Theorem (preliminary version) Every surface is ordinary.
Proof: Begin with an arbitrary triangulated surface. Imagine it as a patchwork
quilt, only instead of imagining traditional square patches of material held together with stitching, imagine triangular patches held together with zip-pairs
(Figure 5). Unzip all the zip-pairs, and the surface falls into a collection of
triangles with zips along their edges. This collection of triangles is an ordinary
surface, because each triangle is homeomorphic to a sphere with a single perforation. Now re-zip one zip to its original mate. Its not hard to show that the
resulting surface must again be ordinary, but for clarity we postpone the details
to Lemma 1. Continue re-zipping the zips to their original mates, one pair at
a time, noting that at each step Lemma 1 ensures that the surface remains ordinary. When the last zip-pair is zipped, the original surface is restored, and is
seen to be ordinary. 2
3
Figure 5. Install a zip-pair along
each edge of the triangulation,
unzip them all, and then re-zip
them one at a time.
Figure 6. These zips only partially occupy the boundary circles, so zipping them yields a
handle with a puncture.
Lemma 1 Consider a surface with two zips attached to portions of its boundary. If the surface is ordinary before the zips are zipped together, it is ordinary
afterwards as well.
Proof: First consider the case that each of the two zips completely occupies a
boundary circle. If the two boundary circles lie on the same connected component of the surface, then the surface may be deformed so that the boundary
circles are adjacent to one another, and zipping them together converts them
into either a handle (Figure 1) or a crosshandle (Figure 2), according to their
relative orientation. If the two boundary circles lie on different connected components, then zipping them together joins the two components into one.
Next consider the case that the two zips share a single boundary circle, which
they occupy completely. Zipping them together creates either a cap (Figure 3)
or a crosscap (Figure 4), according to their relative orientation.
Finally, consider the various cases in which the zips neednt completely occupy their boundary circle(s), but may leave gaps. For example, zipping together
the zips in Figure 6A converts two perforations into a handle with a perforation on top (6B). The perforation may then be slid free of the handle (6C,6D).
Returning to the general case of two zips that neednt completely occupy their
boundary circle(s), imagine that those two zips retain their normal size, while
all other zips shrink to a size so small that we cant see them with our eyeglasses
off. This reduces us (with our eyeglasses still off!) to the case of two zips that
do completely occupy their boundary circle(s), so we zip them and obtain a
handle, crosshandle, cap, or crosscap, as illustrated in Figures 14. When we
put our eyeglasses back on, we notice that the surface has small perforations as
well, which we now restore to their original size. 2
The following two lemmas express the relationships among handles, crosshandles, and crosscaps.
4
Lemma 2 A crosshandle is homeomorphic to two crosscaps.
Proof: Consider a surface with a Klein perforation (Figure 7A). If the parallel
zips (shown with black arrows in 7A) are zipped first, the perforation splits in
two (7B). Zipping the remaining zips yields a crosshandle (7C).
If, on the other hand, the antiparallel zips (shown with white arrows in
Figure 7A) are zipped first, we get a perforation with a Mo¨bius bridge (7D).
Raising its boundary to a constant height, while letting the surface droop below
it, yields the bottom half of a crosscap (7E). Temporarily fill in the top half of
the crosscap with an invisible disk (7F), slide the disk free of the crosscaps
line of self-intersection (7G), and then remove the temporary disk. Slide the
perforation off the crosscap (7H) and zip the remaining zip-pair (shown with
black arrows) to create a second crosscap (7I).
The intrinsic topology of the surface does not depend on which zip-pair is
zipped first, so we conclude that the crosshandle (7C) is homeomorphic to two
crosscaps (7I). 2
Figure 7. A crosshandle is homeomorphic to two crosscaps.
Lemma 3 (Dycks Theorem [1]) Handles and crosshandles are equivalent
in the presence of a crosscap.
Proof: Consider a pair of perforations with zips installed as in Figure 8A. If,
on the one hand, the black arrows are zipped first (8B), we get a handle along
with instructions for a crosscap. If, on the other hand, one tube crosses though
5
itself (8C, recall also Figure 2B) and the white arrows are zipped first, we get a
crosshandle with instructions for a crosscap (8D). In both cases, of course, the
crosscap may be slid free of the handle or crosshandle, just as the perforation
was slid free of the handle in Figure 6BCD. Thus a handle-with-crosscap is
homeomorphic to a crosshandle-with-crosscap. 2
Figure 8. The presence of a crosscap makes a handle cross.
Classification Theorem Every connected closed surface is homeomorphic to
either a sphere with crosscaps or a sphere with handles. Proof: By the preliminary version of the Classification Theorem, a connected closed surface is
homeomorphic to a sphere with handles, crosshandles, and crosscaps.
Case 1: At least one crosshandle or crosscap is present. Each crosshandle is
homeomorphic to two crosscaps (Lemma 2), so the surface as a whole is homeomorphic to a sphere with crosscaps and handles only. At least one crosscap
is present, so each handle is equivalent to a crosshandle (Lemma 3), which is
in turn homeomorphic to two crosscaps (Lemma 2), resulting in a sphere with
crosscaps only.
Case 2: No crosshandle or crosscap is present. The surface is homeomorphic
is a sphere with handles only.
We have shown that every connected closed surface is homeomorphic to
either a sphere with crosscaps or a sphere with handles. 2
Comment. The surfaces named in the Classification Theorem are all topologically distinct, and may be recognized by their orientability and Euler number.
A sphere with n handles is orientable with Euler number 2 – 2n, while a sphere
6
with n crosscaps is nonorientable with Euler number 2-n. Most topology books
provide details; elementary introductions appear in [6] and [2].
Nomenclature. A sphere with one handle is a torus, a sphere with two handles is a double torus, with three handles a triple torus, and so on. A sphere
with one crosscap has traditionally been called a real projective plane. That
name is appropriate in the study of projective geometry, when an affine structure is present, but is inappropriate for a purely topological object. Instead,
Conway proposes that a sphere with one crosscap be called a cross surface. The
name cross surface evokes not only the crosscap, but also the surfaces elegant
alternative construction as a sphere with antipodal points identified. A sphere
with two crosscaps then becomes a double cross surface, with three crosscaps
a triple cross surface, and so on. As special cases, the double cross surface is
often called a Klein bottle, and the triple cross surface Dycks surface [3].
References
[1] W. Dyck. Beitra¨ge zur Analysis situs I. Math. Ann., 32:457512, 1888.
[2] D. Farmer and T. Stanford. Knots and Surfaces. American Mathematical
Society, 1996.
[3] G. Francis and B. Collins. On knot-spanning surfaces: An illustrated essay
on topological art. In Michele Emmer, editor, The Visual Mind: Art and
Mathematics, chapter 11. MIT Press, 1993.
[4] T. Rado´. U¨ber den Begriff der Riemannschen Fla¨che. Acta Litt. Sci. Szeged,
2:101121, 1925.
[5] H. Seifert and W. Threlfall. Lehrbuch der Topologie. Teubner, Leipzig, 1934.
Translated into English as A Textbook of Topology, Academic Press, 1980.
[6] J. Weeks. The Shape of Space. Marcel Dekker, 1985.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
gfrancis@math.uiuc.edu
88 State Street, Canton, NY 13617
weeks@geom.umn.edu
7

attachment

Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Work with Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

## Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
\$0.00

How it works?

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

## Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.