Using Deontological ethics as your theory, write a one-paragraph essay arguing what should be done about one of the six issues in the Issues Readings. Make sure to respond to the author’s arguments, whether deontology comes to the same conclusion or not. Remember, briefly describe the issue, the theory, and what the theory would say about the issue and why.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Who is Responsible for a Living Wage?
Posted by Mike LaBossiere on April 24, 2015 Leave a comment (18) Go to comments
View image | gettyimages.com
There is, obviously enough, a minimum amount of income that a person or family needs in order to
survivethat is, to pay for necessities such as food, shelter, clothing and health care. In order to address
this need, the United States created a minimum wage. However, this wage has not kept up with the cost
of living and many Americans simply do not earn enough to support themselves. These people are
known, appropriately enough, as the working poor. This situation raises an obvious moral and practical
question: who should bear the cost of making up the difference between the minimum wage and a
living wage? The two main options seem to be the employers or the taxpayers. That is, either employers
can pay employees enough to live on or the taxpayers will need to pick up the tab. Another alternative is
to simply not make up the difference and allow people to try to survive in truly desperate poverty. In
regards to who currently makes up the difference, at least in Oregon, the answer is given in the
University of Oregons report on The High Cost of Low Wages in Oregon.
According to the report, roughly a quarter of the workers in Oregon make no more than $12 per hour.
Because of this low income, many of the workers qualify for public assistance, such as SNAP (better
known as food stamps). Not surprisingly, many of these low-paid workers are employed by large, highly
According to Raahi Reddy, a faculty member at the University of Oregon, Basically state and taxpayers
are we helping these families subsidize their incomes because they get low wages working for the
companies that they do. As such, the answer is that the taxpayers are making up the difference
between wages and living wages. Interestingly, Oregon is a leader in two categories: one is the
percentage of workers on public support and the other is having among the lowest corporate tax rates.
This certainly suggests that the burden falls heavily on the workers who are not on public support (both
in and outside of Oregon).
The authors of the report have recommended shifting some of the burden from the taxpayers to the
employers in the form of an increased minimum wage and paid sick leave for workers. Not surprisingly,
increasing worker compensation is generally not popular with corporations. After all, more for the
workers means less for the CEO and the shareholders.
Assuming that workers should receive enough resources to survive, the moral concern is whether or not
this cost should be shifted from the taxpayers to the employers or remain on the taxpayers.
One argument in favor of leaving the burden on the taxpayers is that it is not the moral responsibility of
the corporations to pay a living wage. Their moral obligation is not to the workers but to the
shareholders and this obligation is to maximize profits (presumably within the limits of the law).
One possible response to this is that businesses are part of civil society and this includes moral
obligations to all members of that society and not just the shareholders. These obligations, it could be
contended, include providing at least a living wage to full time employees. It, one might argue, be more
just that the employer pay a living wage to the workers from the profits the worker generates than it is
to expect the taxpayer to make up the difference. After all, the taxpayers are not profiting from the
labor of the workers, so they would be subsidizing the profits of the employers by allowing them to pay
workers less. Forcing the tax payers to make up the difference certainly seems to be unjust and appears
to be robbing the citizens to fatten the coffers of the companies.
It could be countered that requiring a living wage could destroy a company, thus putting the workers
into a worse situationthat is, being unemployed rather than merely underpaid. This is a legitimate
concernat least for businesses that would, in fact, be unable to survive if they paid a living wage.
However, this argument would obviously not work for business, such as Walmart, that have extremely
robust profit margins. It might be claimed that there must be one standard for all businesses, be they a
tiny bookstore that is barely staying afloat or a megacorporation that hands out millions in bonuses to
the management. The obvious reply is that there are already a multitude of standards that apply to
different businesses based on the differences between themand some of these are even reasonable
and morally acceptable.
Another line of argumentation is to attempt to show that there is, in fact, no obligation at all to ensure
that citizens have a living income. In this case, the employers would obviously have no obligation. The
taxpayers would also not have any obligation, but they could elect lawmakers to pass laws authorizing
that tax dollars be spent supporting the poor. That is, the tax payers could chose to provide charity to
the poor. This is not obligatory, but merely a nice thing to do. Some business could, of course, also
choose to be nicethey could pay all their full time workers at least a living wage. But this should, one
might argue, be entirely a matter of choice.
Some folks would, of course, want to take this even furtherif assisting other citizens to have a living
income is a matter of choice and not an obligation arising from being part of a civil society (or a more
basic moral foundation), then tax dollars should not be used to assist those who make less than a living
wage. Rather, this should be a matter of voluntary charityeveryone should be free to decide where
their money goes. Naturally, consistency would seem to require that this principle of free choice be
extended beyond just assisting the poor. After all, free choice would seem to entail that people should
decide as individuals whether to contribute to the salaries of members of the legislatures, to the cost of
wars, to subsidies to corporations, to the CDC, to the CIA, to the FBI and so on. This does, obviously
enough, have some appealthe state would operate like a collection of charity recipients, getting
whatever money people wished to contribute. The only major downside is that it would probably result
in the collapse of civil society.
Purchase answer to see full
Why Work with Us
Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers
We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.
Professional and Experienced Academic Writers
We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.
Free Unlimited Revisions
If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.
Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee
All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.
Original & Confidential
We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.
24/7 Customer Support
Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.
No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.
Admission Essays & Business Writing Help
An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.
Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.
If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.