In at least 250 words, please answer the following questions:Explain one at least one similarity and at least one difference between the governments of ancient Egypt and Sumer, and then explain at least one similarity and at least one difference between the religions of ancient Egypt and Sumer.Please use the assigned material to formulate your answer.Read all the questions before you begin reading.
As you read and write down notes, make notations to indicate material that might help you answer the questions.After you finish all the reading, assemble your notes and answer the questions.Most questions will ask you to provide two to four points to answer the question.Instead of rewriting everything the book or the lecture says about a particular questions, focus on four main points based on what you read in the book or the lecture.Provide an example or two for each point and then move onto the next point.Many questions will ask you to compare and contrast.
For example, the first week’s discussion question asks: “Explain one at least one similarity and at least one difference between the governments of ancient Egypt and Sumer, and then explain at least one similarity and at least one difference between the religions of ancient Egypt and Sumer.” You do not to describe or to explain every single thing about their religion or government. Instead, focus on what the question asks:
What is one similarity between the government of ancient Egypt and that of ancient Sumer? What is one difference between the government of ancient Egypt and that of ancient Sumer? What is one similarity between the religion of ancient Egypt and that of ancient Sumer? What is one difference between the religion of ancient Egypt and that of ancient Sumer? In other words, instead of simply describing the government of Egypt and then the government of Sumer, explain one similarity between their governments and provide examples. Then explain one difference between their governments and provide examples.Then, instead of simply describing the religion of Egypt and then the religion of Sumer, explain one similarity between their religions and provide examples. Then explain one difference between their religions and provide examples.
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Part 2: The Early Civilizations of the Fertile Crescent to 1200 BCE
It is also important to note that these five characteristics are not hard and fast or even
intentional on part of the civilizations. Rather, the earliest civilizations in the West arose as
societies in ancient Mesopotamia and ancient Egypt tried to deal with the realities of the climate
and environment around them. It is to these earliest civilizations, we will turn to next.
Letâ??s first consider what Egypt and Mesopotamia had in common. Both civilizations, as
many other civilizations in the ancient world did, arose in river valleys: Mesopotamia in the
Tigris and Euphrates River Valleys and Egypt in the Nile River Valley. These were good
locations for many reasons: such river valleys offered relatively accessible water supplies,
transportation, and were more easily defensible. Both Egypt and Sumer also arose in regions
that were and still are relatively dry and hot. However, their climate still differed significantly.
For example, ancient Mesopotamia averaged 120 F in the summer with an average of 10 inches
at most of rain annual. And when it did rain, it often flooded in an unpredictable pattern.
Despite the river valleys, the great plains of the region made Mesopotamia constantly vulnerable
to outsider invaders. In contrast, though Egypt was and is dry and hot, the temperatures were
more manageable. In Lower Egypt (Northern Egypt) in the delta region on the coast, the average
temperature during the day was 88 F and in the desert regions of Upper Egypt (Southern Egypt)
104 F. However, its average rainfall was even lower than that of Mesopotamia, with as little as 3
inches of rain a year. However, the Nile Riverâ??s abundance countered this. It flooded in a
regular and predictable manner, though they still occasionally experienced excessive flooding or
droughts. In addition, Egyptâ??s location provided it with a natural defense against foreign
invaders. It was difficult to invade Egypt from the south because of the cataracts or waterfalls on
the Nile, and to the north the marshy delta made a sea invasion almost impossible. The only
viable invasion route was through the Sinai Peninsula, which was covered with a harsh desert.
Mesopotamiaâ??s relatively open geography however allowed for trade with distant regions of the
ancient world, including both ancient India and Egypt, and its uneven distribution of natural
resource encouraged the growth of trade. For example, the South Mesopotamia was far better
for crops but it had few major sources or stone and no metal ores, but developing trade networks
allowed the south to make up for this deficiency.
Because of these differences in environment, as slight as the differences might seem to a
modern, these civilizations would take significantly different paths. Though both civilizations
(as the word indicates) had cites, Mesopotamia in many ways was a much more urbanized region,
while Egypt, which had major cities, such as Thebes and Memphis, in the Lower Delta, remained
a country made up of mainly small, peaceful farming villages. In Sumer, the earliest civilization
of Mesopotamia farming villages began to develop around 7000 BCE and became cities between
about 4300 and 3600 BCE. In Egypt, permanent settlements began around 6000 BCE in the
Delta, and major cities first began to appear around 3200 BCE.
In conjunction with this, Egypt and Mesopotamia differed in the second characteristic of
civilization: government. While both regions had strong governments, Egypt was unified by
3100 B.C. under the pharaoh whom the Egyptians believed was an embodiment of the god Horus.
Though Egypt had a strong tradition of local control, such as the nomes who controlled
groupings of villages, it remained consistently unified for much of its ancient history. By the
third-century BCE, Egypt had developed lists of some thirty-line dynasties stretching back to
2686, and they divided their history or least their golden age into six different eras: the Old
Kingdom between about 2686 and 2160 BCE, the First Intermediate Period, the Middle
Kingdom between 2055 and 1650 BCE, the Second Intermediate Period, the New Kingdom
between 1550 and 1075 BCE, and then the Third Intermediate Period. Just like the Nile River
has a cycle of flooding that brought death and then fertility afterwards, so did the ancient
Egyptians see their history as a period of life and prosperity under the Old, Middle, and New
Kingdoms, while the intermediate periods brought strife, disaster, famine, and death to Egypt.
Egypt, however, did not remain unchanged during this long two-millennium period of history.
For example, as a result of the famine and other disasters that brought down the Old Kingdom,
even in the Middle Kingdom, Egyptian royal authority remained decentralized compared to the
that of the Old Kingdom when the kings built the pyramids and perhaps contributed to its
bankruptcy. In addition, under the New Kingdom, Egyptians, who had previously been happy to
remain isolated, began to expand out of Egypt, conquering territories down the Nile and crossing
the Sinai to conquer Canaan and Syria. Egyptian views of their king changed over time as well,
as they began to see his relationship with their gods differently. In the Old Kingdom, he was
Horus, and while that did not change in the Middle Kingdom, he was expected not simply to be a
distant deity but a good shepherd under whom his subjects were equal with each other.
Nonetheless, they were equally subjected to his benevolent dictatorship. The very name of
pharaoh was not even used until the New Kingdom. But despite the changes that Egypt faced,
politically it was far more stable and consistently unified than Mesopotamia, since Egypt had the
advantage of the usually consistent flooding of the Nile and a geographical defense against
invaders, though it still experienced a few invasions. Beginning in the early twentieth century
BCE, a group of new peoples began to migrate into the Fertile Crescent known as the IndoEuropeans, and over the course of the next few centuries, they would disrupt the region,
including Egypt. There in the middle of the seventeenth century BCE, a group known as Hyksos
(Egyptian for foreigners) migrated into or invaded Egypt. These Hyksos were perhaps Indo-
Europeans themselves, peoples that they displaced, or a combination of both. Regardless, some
Hyksos eventually dominated much of Egypt and introduced horse-drawn chariots, bows, lances,
bronze swords, and the wheel, while adopting Egyptian culture. About a century later, a native
dynasty expelled the Hyksos, and in response to the shock of Hyksos domination, New Kingdom
Egypt became expansionist in order to defend its borders better.
Politically, Mesopotamia was less stable from its earliest history when the city-states of
Sumer dominated it, and it experienced frequent outside invasions and the rise and fall of
empires much more frequently than Egypt did. That was because it had few natural geographical
boundaries to protect it. Before the Amorites dominated Mesopotamia, Sumer generally
remained a collection of independent city-states under the rule of their kings, or lugals. Initially,
priests in Sumerian cities ruled the city, theoretically on behalf of the cityâ??s chief god or goddess,
such as Inanna, who the Sumerians believed built and owned their cities. However, by 2500
BCE, the hereditary kingship of the lugals developed, probably because they had been warlords
whose skills in military leadership allowed them to rival and then supplant the supreme power of
the priests. However, once in control, the kings made up genealogical lists of their predecessors
into which they asserted the gods and goddesses they claimed founded the cities and they turned
one of their gods, Enlil, into the king of the gods. According to myth concerning Enlil, when he
had enslaved the other gods, they threw off his domination and created humans in order to do
their work, and thus the humans were now the slaves, working for the gods in the cities the gods
owned. The priests were far from impotent in these city-kingdoms, since their intercession with
the gods and their administration of the temple complexes were still needed. Throughout ancient
Sumer, each city controlled not only their city but also farmland, villages, and sometimes other
cities, which they had managed to subject to themselves. The cities fought with each other for
resources, often under the guise of fighting for their city deity, and the cities were in a tangle of
constantly changing alliances.
Because of this constant warfare and the geography, Sumer remained vulnerable to outside
invasions. Around 2350, the Akkadians led by their semi-legendary king Sargon invaded
Mesopotamia and subjugated the Sumerians in Western Civilizationâ??s first empire, conquering
most of what is now Iraq and Syria. However, he did not reject Sumerian culture, but claimed
that the Sumerian goddess Inanna had saved him from death as an infant, and she, the moon
goddess, had chosen him to rule, and so he appointed his daughter as the high priestess of Innana
in Ur. His empire hoewever fragmented soon after his death, and the Sumerian city-states soon
reasserted themselves, allowing for renewed infighting as well as the rise of powerful city-states
that dominated much of the region, including Ur under King Ur-Namma around 2112. This king
presented himself as a liberator of the cities from foreign rule, but he also imposed uniformity on
the cities, including standard weights and measures to encourage trade and a standard law code.
That law code perhaps influenced the law code of yet another invading people, the
Amorites who first came into the region around 2300. One of the cities the Amorites established
was Babylon, not far from modern-day Baghdad, and around 1800 BCE, its king Hammurabi
began to expand the cityâ??s influence by playing other Amorites kingdoms against each other,
until he conquered most of the Mesopotamian region. Though the Amorites had already
destroyed the old city-state system, Hammurabiâ??s law betrays the influence of Ur-Nammaâ??s law
code, though Hammurabiâ??s was far harsher. Scholars debate whether or not Hammurabi
intended for judges to use his law like a modern law code. He placed his 275 laws on giant
columns throughout the cities of his empire, so it wasnâ??t exactly accessible like a book is. On
top of the pillars, he placed an image of himself praying to the goddess Shamash, implying that
he received the law from the goddess. His law code was if anything a symbol of his unification
of Mesopotamia, and he wanted to look good as well as in the eyes of future generations of kings
and to guide them through his code. But it also sent a message to the judges that they needed to
be consistent in their judgments, since it threatened them with death for accepting bribes.
Though influenced by Sumerian law codes, it was harsher than most Sumerian codes,
substituting death or mutilation for crimes that had been previously punished with a fine.
After Hammurabiâ??s death, the glory of the Babylonian Empire waned, and it slowly
declined until in 1600 BCE, an Indo-European group known as the Hittites sacked the once
glorious city, ending the empire once and for all, but the city would rise again in another
thousand years, carrying on the legacy of Sumer. In the end, though Mesopotamia remained
politically unstable and vulnerable to invasion, ancient Sumer had a continued influence on
cultures in the region long after it disappeared.
The two regions of Egypt and Mesopotamia also differed significantly in the way that
their environment affected their religious outlook. In Sumer with its harsh and unpredictable
environment, they developed a relatively bleak outlook on the universe. They believed that their
gods were mercurial, cruel, and fickle as the floods that so often devastated the region were. The
gods generally did not care how people behaved as long as they performed the right ceremonies
to appease their wrath. The gods were not morally superior to humans, and though they
punished cheating and lying, it was mainly because such crimes created disorder, not because it
was sinful or immoral. What the gods and goddesses did want was for the people to feed them
meat, beer, bread, and vegetables in their ziggurat temples. So many precious resources were
spent doing so, allowing the power of the priests and lugals to increase. However, all the
benefits of such worship were transitory, because no matter how much one pleased the gods in
this life, everyone, rich and poor, good and bad, could look forward to a bleak, shadowy
existence in the afterlife. Despite all of this, there also developed a tradition of benevolent and
just gods and goddesses who sought to protected their cities, such as Innana in Uruk, and as we
have already seen kings, such as Sargon and Hammurabi, laid claim to a divine calling to justify
The Egyptians had a somewhat different view of life and the gods. They so often
connected their religion and gods with the life-giving nature of the Nile. Their gods were
generous and caring although not necessarily loving and personal. What they believed ordered
the universe was Maâ??at, or the interworking of the universeâ??s parts and the balance of elements,
and the word can be translated as truth, order, or justice, but perhaps the best translation is the
eternal now. Because of the blessings of the Nile, Egyptians tended to be averse to change or
risk taking. Thus, they needed to maintain the worship of the gods with the correct worship in
order to maintain the maâ??at. Because life in Egypt was acceptable, life after death was much the
same as the present life: with the pharaoh on top and everyone else serving the pharaoh. Though
it was not bleak and miserable, neither was it eternal bliss. Rather, for the Egyptians, life, death,
and rebirth were an endless cycle, as endless as the cycle of the Nileâ??s flooding that brought life
out of death. Initially, the afterlife was only for the pharaoh but over the few millennia of
ancient Egyptian history, it was extended first to the upper class and eventually to the lowest of
classes. Like in ancient Sumer, the Egyptian kings believed they had a divine calling; indeed,
they believed they were the god Horus himself, a character in another story of death and rebirth.
According to Egyptian myth, Horus had an unusual conception. For reasons that changed over
the centuries, before Horus was conceived, his uncle Set killed his father Osiris and
dismembered his body, sending it to the four corners of Egypt. In anguish, Osirisâ?? wife-sister,
Isis, gathered his dismembered bodies into the first mummy and then revived the body long
enough for the husband and wife to have sex and conceive Horus. Osiris then died again and
became the Lord of the Dead, while his son, Horus, became the Lord of the Living. Though it
might seem contradictory, Egyptians believed that every king (at least during the Old Kingdom)
was Horus, and when he died he was Osiris.
However, the Egyptian kingâ??s divine power did not go unchallenged. During the New
Kingdom, the powerful priests of Amen-Re became more wealthy and powerful and they began
to question whether or not the pharaoh was actually a god-king; perhaps he was merely a channel
for the divine. The pharaohs generally favored their divine status, but during the reign of
Akhenaten (Amenhotep IV, r. 1363-1347), the pharaoh admitted he was merely a divine channel
but did so by abolishing all religious cults besides that of Aten. In hopes of sustaining his own
power, Akhenaten decided to revere Aten alone (initially a minor sun disk god) as the loving
creator of all things and sustainer of life, and he then suppressed all other cults and had AmenReâ??s name blotted out. He took the name Akhenaten, and he built the new capital of Akhetaten
(horizon of Aten) where he could worship Aten in sun filled courts. What he required from all
Egyptians was that they worship him as the meditator between Aten and the people, and he with
his wife Nefertiti alone could worship Aten. His changes did not last, and eventually his
grandson abolished the new cult and moved back to Thebes, and when a new dynasty seized
control a few generations later, they suppressed Akhenatenâ??s name as much as possible. But the
god-king status of the pharaohs was fully restored.
In many ways, the social and gender structure of ancient Sumer and Egypt were very
similar. Both had a large number of slaves, though in Egypt they did a lot more of the
backbreaking work than those in Sumer. They also both had a very large agrarian class of
farmers, though the environment and climate of Egypt made such work a lot less laborious. At
least from the Middle Kingdom onwards, technically all Egyptians were equal under the law. In
addition, while both had a clear gender hierarchy, the daily life of an Egyptian woman was a lot
less strenuous and though their main role was still to produce children, they could actually own
their own property. As we have seen, perhaps because of the lack of unified rule and the absence
of a god-king, Sumerians and Babylonians developed law codes. The law code of Hammurabi
reveals a lot about Babylonian society and its strict social structure. The code adopted an eye for
eye approach, that is, if a man gouged out the eye of an equal, he would have his eye gouged out.
But if a man gouged out the eye of a social inferior, he would simply have to pay a fine. The law
granted much protection to women, though they remained subjected to men. For example, in
cases of adultery, a husband could have his wife executed, and though her male lover faced the
same punishment in court, if a woman was even suspected of adultery, the law code suggested
she should kill herself to avoid dishonoring her husband. The implication was that women were
baby-making machines, and their worth (as set by the law) was determined by their fertility,
while for men it was determined by social class.
The difference in climate between the two regions also affected their material culture,
including the material on which Egyptians and Sumerians wrote. Though both cuneiform and
hieroglyphics were complex languages that were the monopoly of the elite, Egyptians were able
to write on papyrus, which were more easily preserved than the clay tablets used by the
Sumerians; however, what the Sumerians wrote tended to be much more profound. For example,
the Epic of Gilgamesh from ancient Sumer is an epic tale that explores the meaning of life in a
very thought-provoking way even if it does not offer much comfort. In contrast, Egyptians
mainly focused on praising nature, the pharaoh, and offering practical advice for the scribes.
The climate also shaped what public works they needed. In Sumer especially, there was
a need for an organized government not only to build irrigation systems, canals, and dikes but
also the great temples or ziggurats in which the priests attempted to appease their mercurial and
vindictive gods. In Egypt, there was less need of irrigation systems and, thus, there was more
available labor in between planting and harvesting. As result, in the Old Kingdom, farmers built
Egyptâ??s most recognizable structures, the Great Pyramids of Giza. However, though the
pharaohs had nearly unlimited supplies of labor and built these tombs before Egypt even had the
wheel, the pharaohs ultimately did so not only at the cost of many lives but at the expense of
their power. Despite being such impressive monuments to their divine authority, they exceeded
what Egypt could afford and helped to bankrupt the kingdom.
In conclusion, the greatness of ancient Egypt lasted for millennia, while one people after
another conquered the land of ancient Sumer, Mesopotamia. But Mesopotamia would always
find a way to rise again to be …
Purchase answer to see full
Why Work with Us
Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers
We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.
Professional and Experienced Academic Writers
We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.
Free Unlimited Revisions
If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.
Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee
All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.
Original & Confidential
We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.
24/7 Customer Support
Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.
Try it now!
How it works?
Follow these simple steps to get your paper done
Place your order
Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.
Proceed with the payment
Choose the payment system that suits you most.
Receive the final file
Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.
No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.
No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.
Admission Essays & Business Writing Help
An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.
Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.
If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.